…and after that I fainted for a brief moment.
Saturday, 12th July, 2008
While dentistry continues to shed its old image and like the beautiful peony flower of spring which faithfully reminds us that like the tiny chicken pecks an exit through its shell to freedom, we too shall soon be shedding our cashmere coats and boots to behold endless fields of sheer beauty as spring transitions into summer.
Oral sciences, historically strut their new technologies at their largest shows in the spring each year in Cologne, Germany and
Chicago, Illinois. Dentistry is benefiting tremendously from world wide research and innovative minds.
When was the last time while walking the corridors of a dental/medical building have you heard that shrilling or the blasting burr from a dental drill? Most such procedures are now taken care by laser. It took a little while, but for the records it was Einstein’s law of Relativity and his work on the speed of light showed that gravity had the ability to bend light. That was the beginning of the laser beam.
It is probably more likely to hear waterfalls and to sense the aroma of Asian or Tropical fragrances seeping from dental offices as more and more dentists offer through third parties a “day” of indulging oneself in the spa or a total therapeutic massage work out.
However there are time when it is necessary to administer pharmaceutical agents (drugs) during dental treatment. The first that comes to mind is the placement of a local anesthetic solution to disguise or numb the presence of pain. It is not unusual for patients to have a low threshold and may manifest a mild allergic hypersensitivity to this solution. At other times such reactions can be as a result of too rapid [ injection should take 45 – 60 seconds ] an injection and finally, a tiny bit of the solution may enter into the vascular system during administration which may cause a faint or light headed feeling.
Most anesthetic solutions do contain epinephrine, the main purpose of which, is to reduce bleeding and to constrict or retain the anesthetic solution in place for a longer period. It is more preferable to have a little numbness persisting after the procedure, than to have the patient regain sensitivity before the work is finished. At times during a lengthy procedure the patient may require a second injection.
The purpose of this article is to draw your attention to an the following article published and referenced under JADA (Journal of American Dental Association) which deals with epinephrine-impregnated retraction cords.
Epinephrine acts as a vasoconstrictor when used in dental procedures; however it can act as a vasodilator if it is introduced intravascularly or systemically absorbed. Caution is advised when relative high concentration of epinephrine is impregnated into retraction cords. Please consult your dentist.
| DENTAL PRODUCT SPOTLIGHT |
Gingival retraction Controlling blood, crevicular fluid, water and saliva while taking impressions is critical. Water and saliva can be controlled by air spray. Blood and crevicular fluid can be controlled by retraction cords, hemostatic agents, electrosurgery or rotary gingival curettage.1 Retraction cords displace gingival tissue mechanically; they also can have a chemical action when impregnated with astringents and vasoconstrictors that cause tissue contraction and hemostasis. Electrosurgery creates a trough around the tooth by removing superficial cell layers from the gingival sulcus’ inner lining through application of an electric current. Rotary gingival curettage removes the sulcular epithelium with a high-speed diamond bur. Azzi and colleagues2 studied the effect of retraction cords, electrosurgery and rotary gingival curettage on gingival recession and loss of attachment in dogs. They found that cords had the smallest effect on the gingiva and rotary curettage had the largest effect. Astringents impregnated in retraction cords include aluminum chloride, ferric sulfate, alum (potassium aluminum sulfate) and zinc chloride. Alum and ferric sulfate may be irritating and even corrosive at high concentrations, while increased concentrations of zinc chloride may damage bone and tissue permanently.3 The least irritating cords contain buffered aluminum chloride, which may be left in the sulcus for up to 15 minutes without permanent damage.4 Weir and Williams5 reported that soaking retraction cords in aluminum chloride solution enhances hemostasis. This led Runyan and colleagues1 to study whether soaking cords in aluminum chloride solution has any effect on the ability of the cord to absorb moisture. They found that presoaking had no effect on fluid absorption and, therefore, may be a worthwhile adjunct. Gingival retraction cords containing epinephrine effectively control bleeding; however, from 24 to 92 percent of the epinephrine may be absorbed systemically.6 Epinephrine-impregnated retraction cord contains 8 percent racemic epinephrine. One study estimated the concentration of epinephrine absorbed systemically to be equivalent to approximately 3.9 cartridges of local anesthetic containing 1:100,000 l-epinephrine.7 This estimate is considerably lower than previous estimates because the authors calculated the actual amount of releasable epinephrine in the cord before retraction, which was found to be approximately one-half that of the labeled amount; based their final estimate on the more biologically active l-epinephrine; and found that presoaking in aluminum chloride removed approximately 25 percent of the racemic epinephrine in the cord. There are conflicting reports on whether epinephrine absorbed from retraction cords has any adverse physiological effects.7–11 The potential epinephrine reactions that can occur following systemic absorption include increased anxiety after cord placement, limb tremor, diaphoresis, headache, florid appearance, tachycardia and elevated blood pressure.6 However, there are many variables that make it difficult to predict the physiological effect. These variables include the concentration of epinephrine absorbed from the cord; the length of time the cord is in the sulcus; the condition of the gingival tissue; the presence of crevicular fluid or saliva; individual patient response; and drug interactions with tricyclic antidepressants, nonselective ß-adrenergic antagonists, certain general anesthetics and cocaine.10,11 Therefore, recommendations have been made to either limit or avoid use of such epinephrine-impregnated retraction cords.7,10,11comments to author. mailto:localanesthetics@yahoo.ca M.Sc. PharmD. CCPE WWW.Anestheticnews.com




